Living with terror

This is my roommate and his boyfriend.

Stoney is a war monger

Contrary to popular belief, this piece of shit blog isn’t dead yet. Roughty, you are slacking big time. Dank, you are a substitute teacher. Suit, you live in Virginia Beach.

I feel sad, but good about myself, when I compare my diminutive accomplishments to the even more worthless acts of my colleagues.

To tell the truth, this blog is a little bit like the Federalist Papers, except with a bent towards modern understanding and enjoyment. I mean, what’s the point of living life in the world today if you don’t get something out of it, and what is there to really get? I mean, the modern U.S. citizen chooses between two basic lines of thought: thinking with your big head or thinking with your little head. Don’t get offended, lades, it means the same thing to everyone across the board, with or without a penis. Let’s break it down, old school Good and Bad, people either learn and create, or they watch TV and procreate. Perhaps it’s a bit simple and dramatic, and I’m sure there are those out there who can achieve the middle ground. However, inventing a new school of philosophical thought is hard to do when you’ve got a mouth to feed. Just ask my homey Hemingway.

For me, the President of Iran secured George Bush’s place in history as a forward-thinking President, on the cutting edge of world politics. What the fuck? Well, when jackass Ahmadinejad said that “There are no homos in Iran,” and then he repeated it to make sure we all heard, I went Ding Ding Ding in my head. First of all, the jackasshole President of Columbia fucked up by calling the guy a “dictator.” The guy is clearly not a dictator, the Ayotollah or whatever is calling the shots, not the fucking figurehead president. So the jackass from Columbia starts the whole fucking charade with a false statement, geared towards sensational emotionalism, which clearly struck a chord with the president, the crowd, and everybody who watches. YAY! We all think as he calls the guy out for being a “dicatator.” Nevermind the fact that Iran is quite far from a dictatorship, and even if it was, President Ahmadinejad is only a figurehead, a puppet for the theocracy.

Anyway, the dude’s “homosexuals don’t exist” points to a deep, fundamental difference in cultural understanding between hardcore Fundamental Islam and the freedom that we say we represent. Also, please forget the fact that Fundamental Christians would probably be saying the same exact thing about homos if they were controlling a theocratic state. Anyway, this guy has the balls to talk about “academic freedom” and all this other shit, while at the same time denying a human phenomenon that has been around since the beginning of time. A human body has a certain number of holes, and some people like some holes more than other, and whatever happens culturally to support and encourage your love for your favorite Human Hole is called sexuality. Anyway, to deny that some people like to give/take it up the butt is like denying they have a butthole to violate in the first place. Think about it.

Anyway, this guy is writing a history for his people right now, he is coming to the land of the Crusading Infidels and giving it to us right in our face. I’ll be the first one to admit that the Iraq War and all other wars are fucked beyond fucked, but I will also be the first to admit that wars will never go away, just like flagrant homosexual buttsex won’t either.

After hearing him say that, with a straight face to an audience full of enlightened laughter, I discovered personally that we really are in a war with Iran, and that we do have to win it to prevent an Islamic worldwide proletariat Revolution. All of his statements about “not building a bomb” are just thrown out the window for me. Either the guy is a brilliant orator, who can face public humiliation in the face of his obvious lies, or he actually believes what he is saying, that there are no homos in Iran. Which one is scarier…being lied to about nuclear bombs, or listening to someone publicly plan the nuclear destruction of a global society. I’m not sure.

Anyway, just recently our President, GWB, has been getting thrashed like Denzel Washington gets thrashed by Mathew Broderick in Glory. Bla bla bla, fuck Bush, fuck this, fuck that. I want to know how many people voted for GW who are now talking shit. Mad shit. Don’t vote for him, then, you fucking retard.

Now, to my grand point. Yesterday, the President of Iran proved to the world, on live television in front of and enlightened, opinionated and divided audience in the greatest city in the USA, that he is not playing by our rules. Like Haganav wrote in one of the first political pieces on this blog, these people are not playing by our rules, it is Hamas rules.

The whole time, through this whole mess, I kept thinking to myself that maybe Iran was pursuing peaceful nuclear energy, that maybe everything really is just a spin for Israel, and that I would be proved right.

Wrong. George W. Bush, you got me. I still think you are a knucklehead, elitist fuckwheat, but you were right when you said that Ahmadinejad was a mortal enemy of the U.S,and our closest and most powerful ally, Israel. And I am beginning to think that you were right when you stood by your War on Terror and Islamic Fundamentalism (forget the fact that you fuckhead Christians aren’t any better).

I’m not saying Nuke the Fuckers, but please, nuke them before they nuke us.

PS- Do what the French do. Despite how much we hate them, they are usually right.

The Most Gigantic Lying Mouth of All Time

Here we go, bitches. What is “The Most Gigantic Lying Mouth of All Time?”

I’ll give you all a couple of hints. It’s kinda like a hole, that you get sucked into. You get lots of information from it. Even if you don’t think you are getting “information” from it, it’s giving it to you in the form of opinions, ideas, stories with morals, pictures, sex, and the whole deal.

Radiohead came out with a bunch of short clips and all this other shit that was created only through fan artwork. People sent in their trippiest videos and graphics, and Radiohead made 4 “TV Shows,” which were just 30-minute long music videos of songs and shit.

Quite frankly, the shit was nuts when it came out. Nuts.

The funniest part is that to watch “The most gigantic lying mouth of all time,” you have to turn on the TV. Classic British snooty irony. Classic.

Break it down to some Idioteque, bitches. Shit was released in October of 2000. The top 5 Pop Artists that year were Destiny’s Child, Santana, N’Sync, Christina Aguilera and Faith Hill. Notable mentions include Sisqo, Savage Garden and Creed.

What the fuck is wrong with us, listening to this shit and putting it in our domes? Seriously, what the fuck do these songs talk about and shit? Whether you like it or not, when you listen to it, it’s going into your brain and making some type of fucking connection or impression in your brain, and you just let it happen. What the shit is wrong with you people?

Please don’t take my musical rants as a form of artistic snobbery. Quite frankly, I don’t care what people listen to, it just amazes me THAT they listen to such bullshit. While Radiohead is basically prophesizing the end of the world as we know it, we are listening to Faith Hill and N’Sync. That is how “in sync” we are with the reality of our situation in the world on the earth we listen to. Pop music is like fake lullabies for adults (and adults in the making), kinda like sit-coms and shit like that are for TV.

Remember, kids, Friends is not your friend. Phoebe and Joey really don’t like each other; in real life, Joey is a coked-out weirdo who pays guys for sex, and Phoebe is a Yale graduate who is a lot smarter than you are.

And, at the bottom of it all, I am making assumptions about you, the loser reader reading this blog. I assume that you know what’s going on in the Real World, not the World As We Are Supposed To Know It. I really don’t think we are going to get nuked in the next week, but the social and economic structure underlying the human world is DRAMATICALLY SHIFTING, and has been for the past ten years or so. The US is losing its grip as the King of the Mountain, and that fact is quite undeniable and unarguable.

I will be here, live, to report the end of the world as we know it. I used to always joke about the Mayan end of the world, coming up quick on December 21, 2012. I don’t take it too seriously, though, because humans can’t and won’t ever be able to predict the future with any degree of certainty, just look at the stock market. I also don’t want to come across as that fucking idiot at UF who got TAZED the fuck out on Monday. That guy was obviously a fucking idiot fucktard who doesn’t know how to deal with the Man reasonably. If the Man wants to put you in handcuffs, you better let him, or he is going to fuck you up. Dumbass. In addition, I did feel like the guy was pushing it too hard, and being even slightly violent when the cops stepped in. Listen up, kids, the Man is bigger than you, the Man is in control, and there is nothing you can do about it.

Take it easy, bitches. Don’t forget to watch Idioteque and listen to the words.

Take the money and run.

And this is why you don’t try and mug somebody

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=49750&cl=3998436&ch=61492&src=news

Please, Please, Please check out the second video as well.  It is the best.  They’re building the army. 

And…

russia’s new bomb

And a little local news…

the tree climbing dog.

now for something pretty good.  sorry no substance.  i’m supposed to have a task here any hour now, so i can’t get writing.  I figured i’d just post videos like our laughably lauded loser blog poster, roughty.

The Mexicans Aren’t Terrorists/ Osama Bin Laden is Real

Why aren’t the media calling the Mexicans who bombed the pipelines “terrorists?”

The group that claimed responsibility for the bombs is the Popular Revolutionary Army.

“The EPR boasts a Marxist-Leninist ideology and advocates socialist revolution, the sources said. The EPR also has founded a militarized political party known as the Popular Revolutionary Democratic Party, or Partido Democratico Popular Revolucionario.”

So let’s see…we have a militarized left-wing rebel group attacking capitalist infrastructure. I couldn’t find an “official statement” from the bombers, but it seems to me like the attack is directed towards the faceless multinational corporations who use a country’s raw materials to turn a ridiculous profit, without showing the host country much love.

That’s not terrorism? I just looked up the definition on wikipedia, and it says terrorism is only when innocent people are attacked. So this isn’t terrorism because nobody got hurt.

Anyway, I just thought it was interesting to see that some Mexicans blew up a gas pipeline, and the way the media seemed to brush off the whole story. They fucked up 3 different pipelines, and over 10,000 people had to be evacuated. In my book, that’s a pretty big deal, to blow up a huge pipeline and cause widespread panic and disruption. Personally, I think it’s a little ridiculous to not classify this bombing as terrorist in some aspect.

As a comparison, I will offer 2 examples.

The first is from Fight Club. Let’s imagine at the end of the movie, that they blow up those huge buildings, but nobody dies. No one died at all, the only thing that happened was that those buildings were demolished, all those people couldn’t go to work the next day, everybody’s credit got erased, and Fight Club lived happily ever after. Isn’t that terrorism of some sort? If you take the definition of “people got killed indiscrimately” as the only definition, then what would you call that at the end of Fight Club? It’s not terrorism, because nobody got killed. So what is it? Pseudo-terrorism?

Think about it: If you attack and destroy something’s infrastructure, like a credit machine or a gas pipeline, that is going to have a HUGE impact on everything in that society. Just because nobody died, does that make your attack just a “regular” bombing, rather than a “terrorist” bombing. It’s interesting that violence against a human being is necessary to qualify an attack as terrorist, whereas a multi-level attack against a nationalized corporation is kind of brushed off as a rebel assault. Righhhhht. If these guys are willing and motivated enough to coordinate a massive attack like this, designed specifically to inspire fear and concern for the safety of this government operations, then I would personally call them TERRORIST-ASS-SUCKAS.

My next example comes from Nigeria. Over the last year or so, Nigerian “rebels” have been doing the same goddamn thing over there. They are bombing the fuck out of major oil pipelines, to the point that American companies have abandoned the rigs and sold them to the country, or other people. I don’t have the details. Anyway, why aren’t they terrorists? They fuck some major shit up over there, cause a shitload of $ damage, inspire fear in the government, but they aren’t terrorists.

And now on to the main event, the #1 terrorist in the world according to the GWB Terrorist Rankings, Osama Bin Laden.

Osama Bin Laden is, rightfully so, a touchy subject. I wouldn’t go here unless I felt like I had to. OBL just came out with his new video, and every single fucking thing I read about his speech was that it was “rambling and incoherent,” while most news outlets focused on his “attack on capitalism” and “call for Americans to convert to Islam.”

Religion is a strange thing. Personally, I’m all about God and the spirits, but I don’t believe in the purity or sanctity of any human manifestation (religion). Other than religion fanaticism, though, OBL hit the nail on the head in his transcript. The US media twisted and distorted the things he said, and just hoped none of us read it, and that we took their twisted, distilled message for face value, and not investigate further.

If you’re still here, read these quotes from his speech. I believe that these statements are true and powerful, even though they are coming from the camp of our nation’s sworn enemy, a mastermind of cold-blooded murder of US civilians.

“And for your information media, during the first years of the war, lost its credibility and manifested itself as a tool of the colonialist empires, and its condition has often been worse than the condition of the media of the dictatorial regimes which march in the caravan of the single leader.”

“And among the things which catch the eye of the one who considers the repercussions of your unjust war against Iraq is the failure of your democratic system, despite its raising of the slogans of justice, liberty, equality and humanitarianism. It has not only failed to achieve these things, it has has actually destroyed these and other concepts with its weapons – especially in Iraq and Afghanistan – in a brazen fashion, to replace them with fear, destruction, killing, hunger, illness, displacement and more than a million orphans in Baghdad alone, not to mention hundreds of thousands of widows.” (dunno about the million orphans stat)

“It is time for humankind to know that talk of the rights of man and freedom are lies produced by the White House and its allies in Europe to deceive humans, take control of their destinies and subjugate them.”

“After the failure of your representatives in the Democratic Party to implement your desire to stop the war, you can still carry anti-war placards and spread out in the streets of major cities, then go back to your homes, but that will be of no use and will lead to the prolonging of the war.”

Finally

“It has now become clear to you and the entire world the impotence of the democratic system and how it plays with the interests of the peoples and their blood by sacrificing soldiers and populations to achieve the interests of the major corporations.”

All those statements are true.

Interestingly, Osama tells us to read Michael Scheuer if you need to understand the situation more fully. As the ex-commander of the “CIA Get Osama” team, Scheuer has a deep understanding of the terror war.

Some find him to be sympathetic to the terrorists, or even a terrorist, because he has the capability of understanding a different point of view than his own. Scheuer says we have to kill the enemy, “Anywhere we can, whenever we can, without a great deal of concern for civilian casualties. As I said, war is war. The people who got killed when they were hosting Zawahiri to dinner were not friends of the US.”

In other words, we have to kill every single one of them (men, women and children), or they will kill every single one of us. Osama Bin Laden is not an idiot, he’s not rambling and he’s not incoherent. He is telling us why he wants to kill ALL OF US, and it would serve all of us well to understand where he is coming from instead of ignoring and debasing his ideas.